College Football Public Betting Splits: Bets & Money Percentages
Live college football public betting percentages for today, Saturday, September 26, 2026, show where bettors are putting their tickets and money on every spread, moneyline, and total. CLEATZ refreshes the board every five minutes with live college football betting splits from DraftKings, including bet percentage and handle percentage.
Use the Sharp Signal flags to find the largest gaps between tickets and money, potential signs that a smaller number of bettors are placing larger wagers on one side.
START WINNING!
2026 College Football Betting Splits — Week 4
Public betting leaders
Share of money wagered on each selection. Upcoming games · Current feed snapshot.
Spread · Handle %
- Florida Atlantic -11.5@ ULM94%
- Cincinnati +6vs. Kansas State85%
- Miami FL -41.5vs. Central Michigan83%
- Mississippi State -6vs. Missouri82%
- Oregon State -10.5@ UTEP82%
- West Virginia -1.5vs. Oklahoma State77%
- Alabama -12.5vs. South Carolina76%
- Louisiana -10@ Charlotte72%
- Arkansas -7vs. Tulsa71%
- Minnesota +10@ Washington70%
Total · Handle %
- Over 59.5 PointsMissouri State @ SMU97%
- Over 55.5 PointsKansas State @ Cincinnati96%
- Over 58.5 PointsFlorida Atlantic @ ULM94%
- Over 60.5 PointsOklahoma State @ West Virginia94%
- Under 48.5 PointsGeorgia Tech @ Stanford92%
- Under 55.5 PointsAppalachian State @ NC State89%
- Over 58.5 PointsMissouri @ Mississippi State88%
- Over 52.5 PointsOregon @ USC83%
- Under 52.5 PointsSouthern Miss @ Tulane76%
- Over 54.5 PointsSouth Carolina @ Alabama65%
Moneyline · Handle %
- UMass -192@ Sacramento State96%
- Alabama -520vs. South Carolina94%
- Utah State -148vs. Troy93%
- Arkansas State -238vs. Kennesaw State92%
- Tulsa +220@ Arkansas85%
- NC State -550vs. Appalachian State83%
- Fresno State -535vs. Rice82%
- West Virginia -125vs. Oklahoma State79%
- Georgia Tech -155@ Stanford73%
- Mississippi State -230vs. Missouri72%
Share of tickets on each selection. Upcoming games · Current feed snapshot.
Spread · Bets %
- Fresno State -13.5vs. Rice94%
- Tulane -17.5vs. Southern Miss91%
- Miami FL -41.5vs. Central Michigan88%
- Florida Atlantic -11.5@ ULM86%
- Oregon State -10.5@ UTEP85%
- Alabama -12.5vs. South Carolina79%
- Arkansas State -6.5vs. Kennesaw State79%
- UMass -4.5@ Sacramento State79%
- West Virginia -1.5vs. Oklahoma State73%
- NC State -13.5vs. Appalachian State71%
Total · Bets %
- Over 60.5 PointsOklahoma State @ West Virginia92%
- Over 54.5 PointsSouth Carolina @ Alabama91%
- Over 53.5 PointsKennesaw State @ Arkansas State89%
- Over 58.5 PointsMissouri @ Mississippi State89%
- Over 59.5 PointsMissouri State @ SMU89%
- Over 56.5 PointsOregon State @ UTEP88%
- Over 55.5 PointsKansas State @ Cincinnati86%
- Over 52.5 PointsOregon @ USC85%
- Over 44.5 PointsRice @ Fresno State80%
- Over 52.5 PointsSouthern Miss @ Tulane80%
Moneyline · Bets %
- Oregon State -440@ UTEP96%
- SMU -9000vs. Missouri State96%
- Tulane -1100vs. Southern Miss96%
- Fresno State -535vs. Rice95%
- NC State -550vs. Appalachian State95%
- Louisiana -410@ Charlotte93%
- Arizona -410@ Washington State91%
- UMass -192@ Sacramento State87%
- Arkansas State -238vs. Kennesaw State86%
- Arkansas -270vs. Tulsa81%
Highest market-implied win probability
Total ▲ Total 53.5 → 62.5 Stonehill @ Ohio
Full history builds as line snapshots are captured — the open → current values are shown above.
Total ▼ Total 47.5 → 42.5 James Madison @ Old Dominion
- +43.5 Sat 9/26 · 9:48am
- +44.5 Mon 9/21 · 9:48pm
- +47.5 Mon 9/21 · 9:48am (open)
Spread ▲ Iowa State spread +11.5 → +7.5 Utah @ Iowa State
- +7.5 Thu 9/24 · 9:49pm
- +8.5 Wed 9/23 · 9:48am
- +7.5 Mon 9/21 · 9:48am
- +11.5 Sun 9/20 · 9:48pm (open)
Spread ▲ Mississippi State spread -3 → -6 Missouri @ Mississippi State
- -6 Thu 9/24 · 9:49pm
- -6.5 Mon 9/21 · 9:48am
- -3.5 Sun 9/20 · 9:48pm
- -3 Sun 9/20 · 9:47am (open)
Total ▲ Total 47.5 → 50.5 Boise State @ Western Michigan
- +50.5 Sat 9/26 · 9:48am
- +49.5 Thu 9/24 · 9:49pm
- +50.5 Tue 9/22 · 9:48pm
- +48.5 Mon 9/21 · 9:48am
- +47.5 Sun 9/20 · 9:48pm (open)
Total ▲ Total 52.5 → 55.5 Vanderbilt @ Auburn
- +55.5 Wed 9/23 · 9:48pm
- +54.5 Tue 9/22 · 9:48pm
- +55.5 Tue 9/22 · 9:48am
- +54.5 Mon 9/21 · 9:48pm
- +55.5 Mon 9/21 · 9:48am
- +52.5 Sun 9/20 · 9:47am (open)
Total ▲ Total 51.5 → 54.5 South Carolina @ Alabama
- +54.5 Thu 9/24 · 9:49pm
- +53.5 Tue 9/22 · 9:48pm
- +54.5 Mon 9/21 · 9:48am
- +53.5 Sun 9/20 · 9:48pm
- +51.5 Sun 9/20 · 9:47am (open)
Handle ▲ Miami FL spread handle 1% → 83% 82pp Central Michigan @ Miami FL
- 87% Sat 9/26 · 9:48am
- 80% Wed 9/23 · 9:48pm
- 65% Wed 9/23 · 9:48am
- 24% Tue 9/22 · 9:48pm
- 22% Mon 9/21 · 9:48pm
- 5% Mon 9/21 · 9:48am
- 1% Sun 9/20 · 9:48pm (open)
Bets = tickets · Handle = money. Handle gaps do not establish sharp action.
Trends & market comparison
| Market | Central Michigan | Miami FL |
|---|---|---|
| Kalshi | 1% | 99% |
| Polymarket | 0% | 100% |
Prediction market comparison
Compare available spread and total markets.
Game lines
Estimated spread & totalTotal points · Over
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Total points · Over
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Spread · Miami (FL)
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Spread · Central Michigan
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Bets = tickets · Handle = money. Handle gaps do not establish sharp action.
Trends & market comparison
| Market | Louisiana | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| Kalshi | 76% | 24% |
| Polymarket | 77% | 23% |
| Book | 77% | 23% |
| Novig | 77% | 23% |
Prediction market comparison
Compare available spread and total markets.
Game lines
Estimated spread & totalTotal points · Over
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Total points · Over
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Spread · Louisiana
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Spread · Louisiana
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Bets = tickets · Handle = money. Handle gaps do not establish sharp action.
Trends & market comparison
| Market | South Carolina | Alabama |
|---|---|---|
| Kalshi | 19% | 81% |
| Polymarket | 19% | 81% |
| Book | 20% | 80% |
| Novig | 19% | 81% |
| ProphetX | 19% | 81% |
Prediction market comparison
Compare available spread and total markets.
Game lines
Estimated spread & totalTotal points · Over
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Total points · Over
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Spread · Alabama
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Spread · South Carolina
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Bets = tickets · Handle = money. Handle gaps do not establish sharp action.
Trends & market comparison
| Market | Oklahoma St | West Virginia |
|---|---|---|
| Kalshi | 48% | 52% |
| Polymarket | 48% | 52% |
| Book | 47% | 53% |
| Novig | 47% | 53% |
| ProphetX | 47% | 53% |
Prediction market comparison
Compare available spread and total markets.
Game lines
Estimated spread & totalTotal points · Over
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Total points · Over
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Spread · Oklahoma State
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Bets = tickets · Handle = money. Handle gaps do not establish sharp action.
Trends & market comparison
| Market | Southern Miss | Tulane |
|---|---|---|
| Kalshi | 11% | 89% |
| Polymarket | 11% | 89% |
| Book | 12% | 88% |
Prediction market comparison
Compare available spread and total markets.
Game lines
Estimated spread & totalTotal points · Over
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Total points · Over
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Spread · Tulane
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Spread · Southern Miss
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Bets = tickets · Handle = money. Handle gaps do not establish sharp action.
Trends & market comparison
| Market | Kansas St | Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| Kalshi | 67% | 33% |
| Polymarket | 68% | 32% |
| Book | 66% | 34% |
| Novig | 68% | 32% |
| ProphetX | 67% | 33% |
Prediction market comparison
Compare available spread and total markets.
Game lines
Estimated spread & totalTotal points · Over
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Total points · Over
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Spread · Kansas St.
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Spread · Kansas State
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Bets = tickets · Handle = money. Handle gaps do not establish sharp action.
Trends & market comparison
| Market | Kennesaw St | Arkansas St |
|---|---|---|
| Kalshi | 32% | 68% |
| Polymarket | 34% | 66% |
| Book | 32% | 68% |
| Novig | 32% | 68% |
| ProphetX | 32% | 68% |
Prediction market comparison
Compare available spread and total markets.
Game lines
Estimated spread & totalTotal points · Over
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Total points · Over
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Spread · Arkansas St.
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Spread · Kennesaw State
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Bets = tickets · Handle = money. Handle gaps do not establish sharp action.
Trends & market comparison
| Market | Oregon | USC |
|---|---|---|
| Kalshi | 62% | 38% |
| Book | 62% | 38% |
| Novig | 63% | 37% |
| ProphetX | 63% | 37% |
Prediction market comparison
Compare available spread and total markets.
Game lines
Estimated spread & totalTotal points · Over
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Bets = tickets · Handle = money. Handle gaps do not establish sharp action.
Trends & market comparison
| Market | Appalachian St | NC St |
|---|---|---|
| Polymarket | 17% | 83% |
| Book | 19% | 81% |
| Novig | 18% | 82% |
| ProphetX | 18% | 82% |
Prediction market comparison
Compare available spread and total markets.
Game lines
Estimated spread & totalTotal points · Over
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Spread · Appalachian State
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Bets = tickets · Handle = money. Handle gaps do not establish sharp action.
Trends & market comparison
| Market | Arizona | Washington St |
|---|---|---|
| Kalshi | 78% | 22% |
| Book | 77% | 23% |
| Novig | 79% | 21% |
| ProphetX | 78% | 22% |
Prediction market comparison
Compare available spread and total markets.
Game lines
Estimated spread & totalTotal points · Over
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Spread · Arizona
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Bets = tickets · Handle = money. Handle gaps do not establish sharp action.
Trends & market comparison
| Market | Troy | Utah St |
|---|---|---|
| Kalshi | 43% | 57% |
| Book | 43% | 57% |
| Novig | 43% | 57% |
| ProphetX | 43% | 57% |
Prediction market comparison
Compare available spread and total markets.
Game lines
Estimated spread & totalTotal points · Over
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Spread · Utah St.
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Bets = tickets · Handle = money. Handle gaps do not establish sharp action.
Trends & market comparison
| Market | Missouri | Mississippi St |
|---|---|---|
| Kalshi | 36% | 64% |
| Book | 33% | 67% |
| Novig | 35% | 65% |
| ProphetX | 36% | 64% |
Prediction market comparison
Compare available spread and total markets.
Game lines
Estimated spread & totalTotal points · Over
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Spread · Mississippi St.
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Bets = tickets · Handle = money. Handle gaps do not establish sharp action.
Trends & market comparison
| Market | Tulsa | Arkansas |
|---|---|---|
| Kalshi | 30% | 70% |
| Book | 30% | 70% |
| Novig | 30% | 70% |
| ProphetX | 30% | 70% |
Prediction market comparison
Compare available spread and total markets.
Game lines
Estimated spread & totalTotal points · Over
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Spread · Arkansas
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Bets = tickets · Handle = money. Handle gaps do not establish sharp action.
Trends & market comparison
| Market | Florida Atlantic | ULM |
|---|---|---|
| Kalshi | 80% | 20% |
| Book | 80% | 20% |
| Novig | 80% | 20% |
| ProphetX | 80% | 20% |
Prediction market comparison
Compare available spread and total markets.
Game lines
Estimated spread & totalTotal points · Over
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Spread · Florida Atlantic
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Bets = tickets · Handle = money. Handle gaps do not establish sharp action.
Trends & market comparison
| Market | UMass | Sacramento St |
|---|---|---|
| Kalshi | 64% | 36% |
| Book | 63% | 37% |
| Novig | 63% | 37% |
| ProphetX | 63% | 37% |
Prediction market comparison
Compare available spread and total markets.
Game lines
Estimated spread & totalTotal points · Over
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Spread · UMass
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Bets = tickets · Handle = money. Handle gaps do not establish sharp action.
Trends & market comparison
| Market | Missouri St | SMU |
|---|---|---|
| Kalshi | 2% | 98% |
| Book | 4% | 96% |
| Novig | 2% | 98% |
| ProphetX | 2% | 98% |
Prediction market comparison
Compare available spread and total markets.
Game lines
Estimated spread & totalTotal points · Over
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Spread · SMU
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Bets = tickets · Handle = money. Handle gaps do not establish sharp action.
Trends & market comparison
| Market | Oregon St | UTEP |
|---|---|---|
| Kalshi | 79% | 21% |
| Book | 78% | 22% |
| Novig | 80% | 20% |
| ProphetX | 79% | 21% |
Prediction market comparison
Compare available spread and total markets.
Game lines
Estimated spread & totalTotal points · Over
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Spread · Oregon St.
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Bets = tickets · Handle = money. Handle gaps do not establish sharp action.
Trends & market comparison
| Market | Rice | Fresno St |
|---|---|---|
| Kalshi | 18% | 82% |
| Book | 19% | 81% |
| Novig | 18% | 82% |
| ProphetX | 18% | 82% |
Prediction market comparison
Compare available spread and total markets.
Game lines
Estimated spread & totalTotal points · Over
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Spread · Fresno St.
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Bets = tickets · Handle = money. Handle gaps do not establish sharp action.
Trends & market comparison
| Market | Georgia Tech | Stanford |
|---|---|---|
| Kalshi | 58% | 42% |
| Book | 58% | 42% |
| Novig | 58% | 42% |
| ProphetX | 58% | 42% |
Prediction market comparison
Compare available spread and total markets.
Game lines
Estimated spread & totalTotal points · Over
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Spread · Georgia Tech
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Bets = tickets · Handle = money. Handle gaps do not establish sharp action.
Trends & market comparison
| Market | Minnesota | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Kalshi | 23% | 77% |
| Book | 23% | 77% |
| Novig | 22% | 78% |
| ProphetX | 22% | 78% |
Prediction market comparison
Compare available spread and total markets.
Game lines
Estimated spread & totalTotal points · Over
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Spread · Washington
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Bets = tickets · Handle = money. Handle gaps do not establish sharp action.
Trends & market comparison
| Market | UCLA | Maryland |
|---|---|---|
| Book | 56% | 44% |
Bets = tickets · Handle = money. Handle gaps do not establish sharp action.
Trends & market comparison
| Market | Notre Dame | Purdue |
|---|---|---|
| Book | 95% | 5% |
Bets = tickets · Handle = money. Handle gaps do not establish sharp action.
Trends & market comparison
| Market | Northern Illinois | Georgia St |
|---|---|---|
| Book | 23% | 77% |
Bets = tickets · Handle = money. Handle gaps do not establish sharp action.
Trends & market comparison
| Market | Hawaii | Wyoming |
|---|---|---|
| Kalshi | 7% | 93% |
| Polymarket | 59% | 41% |
| Book | 54% | 46% |
| Novig | 7% | 93% |
| ProphetX | 9% | 91% |
Prediction market comparison
Compare available spread and total markets.
Game lines
Estimated spread & totalTotal points · Over
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Total points · Over
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Spread · Wyoming
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Spread · Hawaii
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Bets = tickets · Handle = money. Handle gaps do not establish sharp action.
Trends & market comparison
| Market | Central Arkansas | Florida St |
|---|---|---|
| Kalshi | 1% | 99% |
| Polymarket | 1% | 99% |
| ProphetX | 49% | 51% |
Prediction market comparison
Compare available spread and total markets.
Polymarket win probabilities are available above. No qualifying spread or total comparison is available.
Game lines
Estimated spread & totalTotal points · Over
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Bets = tickets · Handle = money. Handle gaps do not establish sharp action.
Trends & market comparison
| Market | Ole Miss | Florida |
|---|---|---|
| Kalshi | 33% | 67% |
| Polymarket | 42% | 58% |
| Book | 40% | 60% |
| Novig | 17% | 83% |
| ProphetX | 17% | 83% |
Prediction market comparison
Compare available spread and total markets.
Game lines
Estimated spread & totalTotal points · Over
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Total points · Over
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Spread · Florida
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Spread · Ole Miss
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Bets = tickets · Handle = money. Handle gaps do not establish sharp action.
Trends & market comparison
| Market | Oklahoma | Georgia |
|---|---|---|
| Kalshi | 1% | 99% |
| Polymarket | 16% | 84% |
| Book | 19% | 81% |
| Novig | 1% | 99% |
| ProphetX | 3% | 97% |
Prediction market comparison
Compare available spread and total markets.
Game lines
Estimated spread & totalTotal points · Over
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Spread · Georgia
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Spread · Oklahoma
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Bets = tickets · Handle = money. Handle gaps do not establish sharp action.
Trends & market comparison
| Market | Iowa | Michigan |
|---|---|---|
| Kalshi | 13% | 87% |
| Polymarket | 34% | 66% |
| Book | 34% | 66% |
| Novig | 20% | 80% |
| ProphetX | 22% | 78% |
Prediction market comparison
Compare available spread and total markets.
Game lines
Estimated spread & totalTotal points · Over
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Total points · Over
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Spread · Iowa
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Bets = tickets · Handle = money. Handle gaps do not establish sharp action.
Trends & market comparison
| Market | Utah | Iowa St |
|---|---|---|
| Kalshi | 97% | 3% |
| Polymarket | 75% | 25% |
| Book | 73% | 27% |
| Novig | 97% | 3% |
| ProphetX | 96% | 4% |
Prediction market comparison
Compare available spread and total markets.
Game lines
Estimated spread & totalTotal points · Over
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Total points · Over
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Spread · Utah
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Spread · Utah
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Bets = tickets · Handle = money. Handle gaps do not establish sharp action.
Trends & market comparison
| Market | Boise St | Western Michigan |
|---|---|---|
| Kalshi | 99% | 1% |
| Polymarket | 71% | 29% |
| Book | 71% | 29% |
| Novig | 98% | 2% |
| ProphetX | 97% | 3% |
Prediction market comparison
Compare available spread and total markets.
Game lines
Estimated spread & totalTotal points · Over
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Total points · Over
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Spread · Boise State
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Bets = tickets · Handle = money. Handle gaps do not establish sharp action.
Trends & market comparison
| Market | TCU | UCF |
|---|---|---|
| Kalshi | 36% | 64% |
| Polymarket | 58% | 42% |
| Book | 59% | 41% |
| Novig | 47% | 53% |
| ProphetX | 47% | 53% |
Prediction market comparison
Compare available spread and total markets.
Game lines
Estimated spread & totalTotal points · Over
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Total points · Over
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Spread · TCU
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Bets = tickets · Handle = money. Handle gaps do not establish sharp action.
Trends & market comparison
| Market | New Mexico | New Mexico St |
|---|---|---|
| Kalshi | 99% | 1% |
| Polymarket | 80% | 20% |
| Book | 79% | 21% |
| Novig | 95% | 5% |
| ProphetX | 94% | 6% |
Prediction market comparison
Compare available spread and total markets.
Game lines
Estimated spread & totalTotal points · Over
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Spread · New Mexico
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Bets = tickets · Handle = money. Handle gaps do not establish sharp action.
Trends & market comparison
| Market | UConn | Miami OH |
|---|---|---|
| Kalshi | 30% | 70% |
| Polymarket | 38% | 62% |
| Book | 43% | 57% |
| Novig | 37% | 63% |
| ProphetX | 37% | 63% |
Prediction market comparison
Compare available spread and total markets.
Game lines
Estimated spread & totalTotal points · Over
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Total points · Over
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Spread · Miami (OH)
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Spread · UConn
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Bets = tickets · Handle = money. Handle gaps do not establish sharp action.
Trends & market comparison
| Market | Robert Morris | Buffalo |
|---|---|---|
| Kalshi | 3% | 97% |
| Polymarket | 5% | 95% |
| Book | 6% | 94% |
Prediction market comparison
Compare available spread and total markets.
Polymarket win probabilities are available above. No qualifying spread or total comparison is available.
Bets = tickets · Handle = money. Handle gaps do not establish sharp action.
Trends & market comparison
| Market | Stonehill | Ohio |
|---|---|---|
| Kalshi | 1% | 99% |
| Polymarket | 1% | 99% |
| Book | 5% | 95% |
| Novig | 6% | 94% |
| ProphetX | 4% | 96% |
Prediction market comparison
Compare available spread and total markets.
Polymarket win probabilities are available above. No qualifying spread or total comparison is available.
Game lines
Estimated spread & totalTotal points · Over
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Spread · Ohio
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Bets = tickets · Handle = money. Handle gaps do not establish sharp action.
Trends & market comparison
| Market | North Carolina Central | East Carolina |
|---|---|---|
| Kalshi | 1% | 99% |
| Polymarket | 1% | 99% |
| Book | 5% | 95% |
| Novig | 8% | 92% |
| ProphetX | 4% | 96% |
Prediction market comparison
Compare available spread and total markets.
Polymarket win probabilities are available above. No qualifying spread or total comparison is available.
Game lines
Estimated spread & totalTotal points · Over
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Bets = tickets · Handle = money. Handle gaps do not establish sharp action.
Trends & market comparison
| Market | Houston | Georgia Southern |
|---|---|---|
| Kalshi | 97% | 3% |
| Polymarket | 89% | 11% |
| Book | 87% | 13% |
| Novig | 98% | 2% |
| ProphetX | 97% | 3% |
Prediction market comparison
Compare available spread and total markets.
Game lines
Estimated spread & totalTotal points · Over
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Total points · Over
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Spread · Houston
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Spread · Houston
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Bets = tickets · Handle = money. Handle gaps do not establish sharp action.
Trends & market comparison
| Market | Vanderbilt | Auburn |
|---|---|---|
| Kalshi | 9% | 91% |
| Polymarket | 26% | 74% |
| Book | 23% | 77% |
| Novig | 14% | 86% |
| ProphetX | 9% | 91% |
Prediction market comparison
Compare available spread and total markets.
Game lines
Estimated spread & totalTotal points · Over
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Total points · Over
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Spread · Auburn
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Spread · Vanderbilt
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Bets = tickets · Handle = money. Handle gaps do not establish sharp action.
Trends & market comparison
| Market | Wisconsin | Penn St |
|---|---|---|
| Kalshi | 4% | 96% |
| Polymarket | 23% | 77% |
| Book | 24% | 76% |
| Novig | 11% | 89% |
| ProphetX | 11% | 89% |
Prediction market comparison
Compare available spread and total markets.
Game lines
Estimated spread & totalTotal points · Over
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Total points · Over
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Spread · Penn St.
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Spread · Wisconsin
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Bets = tickets · Handle = money. Handle gaps do not establish sharp action.
Trends & market comparison
| Market | Nebraska | Michigan St |
|---|---|---|
| Kalshi | 86% | 14% |
| Polymarket | 66% | 34% |
| Book | 66% | 34% |
| Novig | 78% | 22% |
| ProphetX | 78% | 22% |
Prediction market comparison
Compare available spread and total markets.
Game lines
Estimated spread & totalTotal points · Over
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Total points · Over
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Spread · Nebraska
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Spread · Nebraska
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Bets = tickets · Handle = money. Handle gaps do not establish sharp action.
Trends & market comparison
| Market | South Florida | Bowling Green |
|---|---|---|
| Kalshi | 77% | 23% |
| Polymarket | 88% | 12% |
| Book | 88% | 12% |
| Novig | 81% | 19% |
| ProphetX | 80% | 20% |
Prediction market comparison
Compare available spread and total markets.
Game lines
Estimated spread & totalTotal points · Over
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Spread · South Florida
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Spread · South Florida
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Bets = tickets · Handle = money. Handle gaps do not establish sharp action.
Trends & market comparison
| Market | James Madison | Old Dominion |
|---|---|---|
| Kalshi | 69% | 31% |
| Polymarket | 67% | 33% |
| Book | 69% | 31% |
| Novig | 69% | 31% |
| ProphetX | 69% | 31% |
Prediction market comparison
Compare available spread and total markets.
Game lines
Estimated spread & totalTotal points · Over
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Total points · Over
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Spread · James Madison
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Spread · James Madison
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Bets = tickets · Handle = money. Handle gaps do not establish sharp action.
Trends & market comparison
| Market | Delaware | Virginia |
|---|---|---|
| Kalshi | 9% | 91% |
| Polymarket | 9% | 91% |
| Book | 10% | 90% |
| Novig | 9% | 91% |
| ProphetX | 9% | 91% |
Prediction market comparison
Compare available spread and total markets.
Game lines
Estimated spread & totalTotal points · Over
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Total points · Over
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Spread · Virginia
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Spread · Delaware
Polymarket · Implied probability at each line
Bets = tickets · Handle = money. Handle gaps do not establish sharp action.
Trends & market comparison
| Market | Incarnate Word | Texas St |
|---|---|---|
| Kalshi | 5% | 95% |
| Polymarket | 7% | 93% |
| Book | 7% | 93% |
| Novig | 5% | 95% |
| ProphetX | 5% | 95% |
Prediction market comparison
Compare available spread and total markets.
Polymarket win probabilities are available above. No qualifying spread or total comparison is available.
Game lines
Estimated spread & totalTotal points · Over
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Spread · Texas St.
Kalshi · Implied probability at each line
Bets = tickets · Handle = money. Handle gaps do not establish sharp action.
Trends & market comparison
Splits via cleatz.com. 21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER.
What Is Public Betting in College Football?
Public betting refers to the wagers placed by the general betting population — recreational bettors, casual fans, and weekend players – on a given college football game. “Public betting splits” track two distinct numbers: the percentage of bets (total ticket count) and the percentage of handle (total dollars wagered) on each side of a spread, total, or moneyline.
The gap between those two numbers is where the value lives. If 80% of bettors are on Alabama but only 55% of the handle is, the bets are small, and the big money is sitting on the other side. That’s the fingerprint of sharp action, and it’s the entire reason this page exists.
College football is uniquely vulnerable to public skew for four reasons:
- Saturday tradition. CFB is a once-a-week event for casual bettors. They place lottery-ticket parlays Friday night and Saturday morning, then disappear, which concentrates square money on a handful of marquee games.
- Ranked-team bias. The AP poll and CFP rankings act as a flashing “bet me” sign. The public reflexively backs ranked teams, especially top-10 favorites, regardless of price or matchup.
- ESPN narrative effect. College Gameday, primetime windows, and Heisman storylines push casual money toward whichever side has the bigger headline that week.
- Blowout-hunting parlays. Recreational bettors stack 4-team parlays of double-digit favorites, inflating the public % on every chalk on the board.
Sportsbooks know all of this and shade lines accordingly. Knowing where the public is, and where it isn’t, is the first step to finding the spots where the line has moved too far.
How to Use Public Betting Data to Make Smarter Picks
Five frameworks for turning splits into actual edges.
Fading the Public — When It Works, When It Doesn’t
Blindly betting against the public is a losing strategy. Years of pick’em data show that fading a 70%+ public side wins around 50-52% — not enough to beat the vig. Where fading actually works is at the extremes and on totals: when a side hits 80%+ of bets and the line has moved toward the public side (rare), or on overs in nationally televised primetime games where casuals stack the over by reflex. Fade selectively. The dumb-money side losing is a real edge — but only when the books haven’t already priced it in.
Following Sharp Money — Handle/Bets Divergence as the Signal
The single most useful signal on this page. When a side has a much higher handle % than bets %, you have asymmetric information: a small number of bettors are wagering large amounts. Those are professional or syndicate bettors, and they hit at a documented edge over time. Look for divergences of 15+ points (e.g. 70% handle, 50% bets). The bigger the gap, the louder the signal. Cleatz flags these with a Sharp Signal tag on every game card. Cross-reference with line movement: sharp money that also moves the line is the cleanest setup in college football betting.
Reverse Line Movement — Line Moves Against the Public
Reverse line movement (RLM) is when the spread or total moves in the opposite direction of the public bet percentage. If 75% of bets are on Georgia -7 but the line drops to Georgia -6, the book is absorbing one-sided sharp money on the other side and moving the line to chase it. Books don’t move lines against the public unless they’re forced to by big bets. RLM is one of the most studied indicators in sports betting research — it has consistently produced a small but real edge in CFB over the past decade, particularly on Saturday morning lines that close lower than they opened despite heavy public support.
Steam Moves and the Syndicate Effect
A steam move is a fast, coordinated line move across multiple sportsbooks at once — usually within minutes — driven by professional bettor syndicates hitting the same number simultaneously. Steam is louder than handle divergence because it forces every book to react. In college football, steam most often hits on Saturday morning openers and bowl-season lines, when sharp groups crash markets before recreational money arrives. If you see a CFB total drop a full point in fifteen minutes with no injury news or weather change, that’s steam. The public hasn’t seen it yet, but the line has already moved — and the closing line is usually where it ends up.
When Public + Sharp Align (Consensus Plays)
Most of the time, sharp and public money sit on opposite sides. But occasionally — maybe once or twice a Saturday — both sides agree: the public is on a team and the handle is on the same team and the line is moving with them. Counterintuitively, that’s a strong signal, not a weak one. It usually means the line opened soft and everyone with money saw it. Consensus plays don’t carry the contrarian thrill of fading the public, but they’re often the highest-confidence positions on the board. Cleatz surfaces these on individual game cards where the handle and bets percentages match within a few points on the same side as the line move.
College Football Public Betting Trends to Watch
Six evergreen patterns that show up in CFB betting splits year after year.
Ranked-Team Overbetting in Non-Conference Openers
Top-25 teams open Week 1 against directional-school underdogs and the public floods the favorite. Spreads inflate by 2-4 points off opener. Underdog +21 closes at +24. The blowout doesn’t always come — backdoor covers and rust-related sloppy starts are common in Week 1.
Home Dog Value in Conference Rivalry Games
The Iron Bowl, the Apple Cup, Bedlam-style games, anything with a trophy. Public hammers the ranked road favorite. Home dogs in rivalry games have historically covered at above-market rates because emotion, crowd noise, and motivation aren’t priced in by computer models.
Overs in Primetime SEC Matchups
CBS 3:30, ABC 7:30, SEC on ESPN primetime — the public bets the over by reflex. Casual bettors associate big-name SEC teams with offensive fireworks. The bet % on overs in primetime conference games regularly hits 70%+ regardless of the actual total or pace data.
Unders in Pace-Down Big Ten Games
Iowa, Wisconsin, Northwestern, Minnesota — slow-tempo, run-first offenses that grind clock. The public sees a 41.5 total and assumes the over is “easy.” Pace and play-count data say otherwise. These games go under at a meaningful clip, especially in November weather.
Conference Championship Line Value
SEC, Big Ten, ACC, Big 12 title games sit on neutral fields with playoff implications. Public bets the higher-ranked favorite. Sharps target the underdog — especially when the underdog has already lost to the favorite once that season (motivation skew) or when the favorite has nothing to play for above its current CFP seed.
Bowl Season Public Skew (Matchup Unfamiliarity, Motivation Gaps)
The hardest spots on the calendar to handicap and the easiest to misprice. The public bets the bigger brand and the higher-ranked team. Sharps target opt-outs, coaching changes, transfer portal departures, and motivation gaps — Group of 5 teams with everything to prove against P4 teams just trying to get home for the holidays.
CFB Betting Splits Glossary
Every term you’ll see on this page, defined in plain English. Bookmark this section — these are the words sportsbook content uses without explaining.
- Handle
- The total dollar amount wagered on a side, market, or game. Handle % on this page shows the share of those dollars on each side of the spread, total, or moneyline. Handle is money-weighted — one $10,000 bet counts the same as one hundred $100 bets.
- Bets (Ticket Count)
- The number of individual wagers placed on a side, regardless of bet size. Bets % is the share of total tickets on each side. Bets % reflects how many bettors are on a side; Handle % reflects how much money is. The gap between the two is where sharp action shows up.
- Splits
- Shorthand for the public betting percentages on a game — both bets and handle, broken out by side. “Checking the splits” means looking at where the money and the tickets are sitting on the spread, total, and moneyline before placing a bet.
- Sharp Money (Wiseguy Money)
- Wagers placed by professional or syndicate bettors who consistently beat the market. Sharp money shows up as a Handle % significantly higher than Bets % on the same side — fewer bettors, but with much bigger tickets. Sometimes called “wiseguy money” or “smart money.” Sportsbooks track sharp accounts closely and often move lines on their action alone.
- Square Money (Public Money)
- Wagers placed by recreational or casual bettors — the general public. Square money shows up as a high Bets % with a relatively low Handle % (many small bets) and tends to pile onto favorites, overs, and primetime games. “Going with the public” usually means following square money.
- Steam
- A fast, coordinated line move across multiple sportsbooks at once — usually within minutes — driven by professional betting syndicates hitting the same number simultaneously. If a CFB total drops a full point in fifteen minutes with no injury or weather news, that’s steam. “Chasing steam” means trying to bet a number before the rest of the market catches up.
- Reverse Line Movement (RLM)
- When the spread or total moves in the opposite direction of the public bet percentage. If 75% of bets are on Georgia -7 but the line drops to Georgia -6, that’s RLM — the sportsbook is absorbing one-sided sharp action on the other side and moving the line to chase it. RLM is one of the most studied edges in sports betting research.
- Consensus Pick
- The side that the majority of the betting public is on for a given market — typically defined as 60%+ of bets. A “consensus pick” page (like this one) aggregates those majority sides across every game on the board so bettors can see at a glance where the crowd is leaning.
- Fading the Public
- Betting against the side that the majority of recreational bettors are on. The theory is that sportsbooks shade lines toward popular sides, creating value on the unpopular side. In college football, fading works best at extremes (80%+ public) and on primetime overs — not as a blind rule on every game with a 60% public side.
- Line Movement
- Any change in the point spread, total, or moneyline between when a game opens and when it closes. Lines move because of three things: sharp money hitting a number, public money piling onto one side, or new information (injuries, weather, lineup changes). Tracking line movement against the public percentage is how you identify RLM and steam.
- Moneyline
- A bet on which team will win the game outright, with no point spread. Odds are expressed as -150 (favorite, bet $150 to win $100) or +200 (underdog, bet $100 to win $200). Moneyline splits show where the public is on the straight-up winner, which differs from spread splits — big-name favorites can be moneyline-heavy public sides but spread-heavy sharp sides.
- Spread
- The point handicap a sportsbook applies to make a game even-money on both sides. Alabama -14.5 means Alabama must win by 15+ to cover the spread; the opponent +14.5 wins the bet by losing by 14 or fewer, or winning outright. The spread market is where public bias is most visible — and where most sharp action lives.
- Total (Over/Under)
- A bet on the combined final score of both teams. The sportsbook posts a number (e.g., 52.5) and bettors wager whether the final combined score will go over or under that line. CFB totals are heavily influenced by public bias on primetime games — casuals reflexively bet overs — which creates value on unders when sharp money agrees.
START WINNING!
Frequently Asked Questions
Everything bettors ask about college football public betting splits, handle, and sharp money.
How does public betting work in college football?
Public betting tracks two numbers for every college football game: the percentage of total bets (ticket count) and the percentage of total handle (dollars wagered) on each side of the spread, total, and moneyline. Sportsbooks publish these splits — Cleatz aggregates them from DraftKings — so bettors can see where the crowd is and, more importantly, where the big money disagrees with the crowd.
Can you legally bet on college football?
Yes — college football betting is legal in more than 30 US states with operational sportsbooks, including most major markets. A handful of states (notably Oregon, New Jersey, New York, and others) restrict in-state college team betting or player props, even where general CFB wagering is allowed. You must be 21 or older in most states (18+ in New Hampshire and Wyoming) and physically located inside a state where the operator is licensed. Always check your state’s specific rules before placing a bet.
Should I bet with or against the public in CFB?
Neither strategy works on autopilot. Blindly fading public sides over 70% wins about 50-52% long-term — not enough to beat the vig. The smarter play is to use public betting percentages as one input alongside line movement, handle/bets divergence, and matchup data. The biggest edges come from spots where the handle says one thing and the bet count says another — sharp money signals — not from contrarianism for its own sake.
What does it mean to fade the public?
Fading the public means betting against the side that the majority of recreational bettors are on. The theory: sportsbooks shade lines toward popular sides to balance their books, creating value on the unpopular side. In college football, fading works best at extremes (80%+ public on one side) and on totals in nationally televised primetime games, where casual money piles onto overs by reflex. It does not work as a blind rule on every game with a 60% public side — the books have already priced that in.
How often does the public lose in college football?
Heavily public CFB sides (70%+ of bets) historically cover the spread about 48-49% of the time — slightly worse than a coin flip after vig. That gap widens at extremes: 85%+ public sides have covered closer to 46-47%, particularly on big spreads where blowout-hunting public parlays distort the percentages. The headline of “the public always loses” is overstated, but there’s a real, measurable cost to being on the popular side over a full season.
What’s the difference between handle and bets?
Bets % is the percentage of individual tickets placed on a side — count-based, doesn’t care about dollar amount. Handle % is the percentage of total dollars wagered — money-based, weighted by bet size. If 80% of bets but only 55% of handle is on Alabama, the public is on Alabama in volume but the big money — typically sharp or syndicate bettors — is on the other side. The gap between handle and bets is the most useful number on any public betting page.
Where does Cleatz get its public betting data?
Cleatz aggregates college football public betting splits from DraftKings Sportsbook’s published handle and bets percentages, refreshed every 5 minutes. DraftKings is one of the largest US sportsbooks by handle, which makes its splits a strong proxy for overall market activity. We do not estimate, model, or project public percentages — every number shown is sourced directly from the book.
How often is this page updated?
Public betting splits on this page refresh every 15 minutes. Sharp Signal flags and the “biggest sharp signal today” callout update on the same cadence. During Saturday game days, expect the largest line and handle movement in the final 4-6 hours before kickoff as professional money arrives. The timestamp above the widget always reflects the last refresh.
What is a Sharp Signal?
A Sharp Signal is a Cleatz flag that triggers when a side has significantly more handle % than bets % — meaning a small number of bettors are wagering large amounts on that side. It’s the cleanest indicator of professional or syndicate action in the data. We flag any game where the gap between handle and bets exceeds 15 percentage points. The bigger the gap, the louder the signal.
What does it mean when handle and bets percentages don’t match?
A mismatch — where handle % and bets % on the same side differ by 10+ points — tells you the average bet size is different on each side. If handle % is higher than bets %, bigger bettors are on that side (a sharp money tell). If bets % is higher than handle %, more bettors are on that side but they’re betting smaller amounts (a public money tell). Matching percentages (within 3-5 points) mean public and sharp are aligned, which can itself be a confidence signal.
Jason Ziernicki is the founder of CLEATZ and has worked in the online sports betting industry since 2012. At CLEATZ, he focuses on public betting data, sportsbook line movement, prediction markets and data-driven sports betting tools.